PhD Student at UCI
Hi 👋! I am Yuangang Li, a PhD student at the Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, where I am fortunate to be advised by Prof. Cristina (Crista) Lopes.
Before my PhD study at UCI, I spent wonderful years at the University of Southern California, completing my Master’s degree and working with Prof. Yue Zhao. During that time, I also had the pleasure of collaborating with Prof. Xiyang Hu and Prof. Jiechao Gao.
My research interests are centered around trustworthy AI, AI agents evaluation and optimization, and AI auditing (programming-language verification for AI).
AAAI ×2 · ACL Findings ×2 · EMNLP Findings, etc.
More detailsHide detailsEMNLP · NeurIPS E&D ×2, etc.
More detailsHide detailsNature AI · ACM MM · IEEE BIBM · ICDM Workshop
More detailsHide detailsA language model can reach the right answer for the wrong reason, and accuracy alone cannot tell the two apart. My work tries to make that difference visible and to shrink it. One part is reasoning itself: fine-tuning on explicit causal structure reduces hallucination, and STRAT builds the separation between data and the rules that act on it into the architecture, so logical rules can be learned from ten base examples per dataset. Another part is detection: benchmarks for anomalous text, and an evaluation of how well LLMs serve as detectors. The same concern runs through interpretable classifiers whose decisions can be read clause by clause, radiology reports anchored to the anatomy, and simulations of human decision-making grounded in real population data.
All papers in this line of work; the full list is on the Publications page.
Agents are usually scored by whether the final output passes a test, which says little about how they got there or how they compare across tasks. I work on evaluation that looks closer. For coding, CodeRQ-Bench and the VERA evaluator score the reasoning behind a solution rather than only its result. Across the field, Harbor Adapters brings more than 80 agentic benchmarks behind one interface, and Harbor-Index distills them into 82 hard tasks on which no tested model–harness pair clears 30%; Agents’ Last Exam adds over 1,000 long-horizon tasks written by practitioners. On the optimization side, I study where capacity should go inside agent pipelines — which stage of a generate–critique–revise loop actually needs a large model — and why automation stalls in operationally complex industries.
All papers in this line of work; the full list is on the Publications page.
When data cannot leave the hospital or the device that produced it, the model has to be trained where the data lives, and every round of communication costs bandwidth and energy. My work here makes federated training cheaper without giving up accuracy. H-FedSN trains personalized sparse networks across a client–edge–cloud hierarchy and cuts communication by up to 238×; FedBCGD, aimed at large models, has each client upload a single block of parameters per round. The same constraints show up in applications: personalized medication across distributed healthcare systems, and spatio-temporal graph learning where raw data is never pooled.
All papers in this line of work; the full list is on the Publications page.
A few questions I get often, answered ahead of time. For anything else, just email me.
My first-author paper Beyond Output Correctness has been accepted to the Main Conference of EMNLP 2026 (15.4% acceptance rate)! The paper argues that grading only the final answer misses how a model got there, and introduces CodeRQ-Bench and the two-stage evaluator VERA to score the reasoning itself. See you in Budapest. [arXiv] [GitHub]